at91: kernel v5.15: remove upstreamed patches

[openwrt/openwrt.git] / target / linux / at91 / patches-5.15 / 130-regulator-mcp16502-lpm-pin-can-be-optional-on-some-p.patch

diff --git a/target/linux/at91/patches-5.15/130-regulator-mcp16502-lpm-pin-can-be-optional-on-some-p.patch b/target/linux/at91/patches-5.15/130-regulator-mcp16502-lpm-pin-can-be-optional-on-some-p.patch
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 12679a2..0000000
--- a/target/linux/at91/patches-5.15/130-regulator-mcp16502-lpm-pin-can-be-optional-on-some-p.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-From 763fe72f607d4e929d2c710c88e5c6978dd6ad97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 16:15:26 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH 130/247] regulator: mcp16502: lpm pin can be optional on some
- platforms
-
-On some platform (e.g. SAMA7G5) LPM pin should be optional as it can
-be controlled explicitly (via shutdown controller registers) in the
-platform specific power saving code to decrease the power consumption
-while suspended as this SoC pin may be connected to other devices that
-could take power saving actions based on its value.
-
-Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1610028927-9842-3-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com
-Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
----
- drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
---- a/drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c
-+++ b/drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c
-@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int mcp16502_probe(struct i2c_cli
-       config.regmap = rmap;
-       config.driver_data = mcp;
- 
--      mcp->lpm = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "lpm", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
-+      mcp->lpm = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "lpm", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
-       if (IS_ERR(mcp->lpm)) {
-               dev_err(dev, "failed to get lpm pin: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(mcp->lpm));
-               return PTR_ERR(mcp->lpm);