mtd: remove the warning about read-only caused by size vs. block boundary mismatch
authorFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Sun, 10 May 2015 16:09:58 +0000 (16:09 +0000)
committerFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Sun, 10 May 2015 16:09:58 +0000 (16:09 +0000)
Since the kernel/rootfs split handling was modified 2 years ago by r37283 (
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/37283 ) and by the subsequent checkins,
users have seen rather scary mtd errors in the log at every boot. The message
ends "-- forcing read-only", which looks a bit error-like. That error has
been mentioned in some forum threads, when users have noticed this message
instead of some actual error.

[    2.940000] 0x000000070000-0x000000ff0000 : "firmware"
[    2.970000] 2 netgear-fw partitions found on MTD device firmware
[    2.970000] 0x000000070000-0x000000188440 : "kernel"
[    2.980000] mtd: partition "kernel" must either start or end on erase
block boundary or be smaller than an erase block -- forcing read-only
[    2.990000] 0x000000188440-0x000000ff0000 : "rootfs"

The patch removes the rather useless warning message.

signed-off-by: Hannu Nyman <hannu.nyman@iki.fi>

SVN-Revision: 45669

target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/411-mtd-partial_eraseblock_write.patch
target/linux/generic/patches-4.0/411-mtd-partial_eraseblock_write.patch

index 0bb7be08484561ea2bbc3477214704c8b1889178..0c117c27030f1cdf46fd170ff4eb43e926bd1661 100644 (file)
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
                if (instr->fail_addr != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)
                        instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
                instr->addr -= part->offset;
-@@ -514,18 +582,24 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
+@@ -514,18 +582,21 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
        if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
            mtd_mod_by_eb(slave->offset, &slave->mtd)) {
                /* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
 +              else
 +                      slave->mtd.erasesize = slave->mtd.size;
        }
-+      if ((slave->mtd.flags & (MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL|MTD_WRITEABLE)) == MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL)
-+              printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" must either start or end on erase block boundary or be smaller than an erase block -- forcing read-only\n",
-+                              part->name);
  
        slave->mtd.ecclayout = master->ecclayout;
        slave->mtd.ecc_step_size = master->ecc_step_size;
index ed6f4a31525588ea17eb53aca881e92115594545..94aa6aecd0fb95e45a94742264c751584877d254 100644 (file)
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
                if (instr->fail_addr != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)
                        instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
                instr->addr -= part->offset;
-@@ -513,18 +581,24 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
+@@ -513,18 +581,21 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
        if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
            mtd_mod_by_eb(slave->offset, &slave->mtd)) {
                /* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
 +              else
 +                      slave->mtd.erasesize = slave->mtd.size;
        }
-+      if ((slave->mtd.flags & (MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL|MTD_WRITEABLE)) == MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL)
-+              printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" must either start or end on erase block boundary or be smaller than an erase block -- forcing read-only\n",
-+                              part->name);
  
        slave->mtd.ecclayout = master->ecclayout;
        slave->mtd.ecc_step_size = master->ecc_step_size;