From: Florian Fainelli Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:58:06 +0000 (+0000) Subject: [brcm63xx] mask the USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT symbol since brcm63xx ehci does not implemen... X-Git-Url: http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt%2Fsvn-archive%2Farchive.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=8e3d484d5f7ba2a26500749f46f8096522eeccfe [brcm63xx] mask the USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT symbol since brcm63xx ehci does not implement it at all, fixes usb 2.0 issues on bcm6358 SVN-Revision: 16882 --- diff --git a/target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.27/008-usb_ehci_support.patch b/target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.27/008-usb_ehci_support.patch index 630078b2f1..4019683333 100644 --- a/target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.27/008-usb_ehci_support.patch +++ b/target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.27/008-usb_ehci_support.patch @@ -45,3 +45,14 @@ Signed-off-by: Maxime Bizon static inline unsigned int ehci_readl(const struct ehci_hcd *ehci, __u32 __iomem * regs) { +--- a/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig 2009-07-03 01:33:19.000000000 +0200 ++++ b/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig 2009-07-17 17:53:11.000000000 +0200 +@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ + + config USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT + bool "Root Hub Transaction Translators" +- depends on USB_EHCI_HCD ++ depends on USB_EHCI_HCD && !BCM63XX + ---help--- + Some EHCI chips have vendor-specific extensions to integrate + transaction translators, so that no OHCI or UHCI companion