From: Shiji Yang Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:40:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ath10k-ct: fix missing-prototypes warnings on 6.12 kernel Fix various missing-prototypes warnings by: * Mark functions only used in current source file as static. * Comment out unused functions. /workspaces/openwrt/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl/linux-x86_64/ath10k-ct-regular/ath10k-ct-2025.03.14~63f5b605/ath10k-6.18/debug.c:425:6: error: no previous prototype for 'ath10k_debug_fw_ratepwr_table_process' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 425 | void ath10k_debug_fw_ratepwr_table_process(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /workspaces/openwrt/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl/linux-x86_64/ath10k-ct-regular/ath10k-ct-2025.03.14~63f5b605/ath10k-6.18/debug.c:437:6: error: no previous prototype for 'ath10k_debug_fw_powerctl_table_process' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 437 | void ath10k_debug_fw_powerctl_table_process(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /workspaces/openwrt/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl/linux-x86_64/ath10k-ct-regular/ath10k-ct-2025.03.14~63f5b605/ath10k-6.18/debug.c:884:5: error: no previous prototype for 'ath10k_refresh_target_pdev_ext_ct_stats' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 884 | int ath10k_refresh_target_pdev_ext_ct_stats(struct ath10k *ar) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /workspaces/openwrt/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl/linux-x86_64/ath10k-ct-regular/ath10k-ct-2025.03.14~63f5b605/ath10k-6.18/htt_tx.c:1190:6: error: no previous prototype for 'ieee80211_is_robust_mgmt_frame_tx' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 1190 | bool ieee80211_is_robust_mgmt_frame_tx(struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /workspaces/openwrt/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl/linux-x86_64/ath10k-ct-regular/ath10k-ct-2025.03.14~63f5b605/ath10k-6.18/wmi.c:3203:5: error: no previous prototype for 'ath10k_wmi_event_txbf_cv_mesg' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 3203 | int ath10k_wmi_event_txbf_cv_mesg(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang --- ath10k-6.18/debug.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/ath10k-6.18/debug.c +++ b/ath10k-6.18/debug.c @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ static void ath10k_debug_fw_stats_reset( spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock); } +/* void ath10k_debug_fw_ratepwr_table_process(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb) { size_t sz = skb->len; @@ -447,6 +448,7 @@ void ath10k_debug_fw_powerctl_table_proc memcpy(ar->debug.powerctl_tbl.data, skb->data, sz); complete(&ar->debug.powerctl_tbl_complete); } +*/ void ath10k_debug_fw_stats_process(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb) { @@ -883,7 +885,7 @@ static int ath10k_refresh_target_rx_reor return 0; /* fail silently if firmware does not support this option. */ } -int ath10k_refresh_target_pdev_ext_ct_stats(struct ath10k *ar) +static int ath10k_refresh_target_pdev_ext_ct_stats(struct ath10k *ar) { if (test_bit(ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_CUST_STATS_CT, ar->running_fw->fw_file.fw_features)) --- a/ath10k-6.18/htt_tx.c +++ b/ath10k-6.18/htt_tx.c @@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static u8 ath10k_htt_tx_get_tid(struct s * since we do tx hw crypt, and it won't actually be encrypted even when this flag is * set. */ -bool ieee80211_is_robust_mgmt_frame_tx(struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr) +static bool ieee80211_is_robust_mgmt_frame_tx(struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr) { if (ieee80211_is_disassoc(hdr->frame_control) || ieee80211_is_deauth(hdr->frame_control)) --- a/ath10k-6.18/wmi.c +++ b/ath10k-6.18/wmi.c @@ -3206,7 +3206,7 @@ printme: return 0; } -int ath10k_wmi_event_txbf_cv_mesg(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb) +static int ath10k_wmi_event_txbf_cv_mesg(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct wmi_txbf_cv_event *ev;