svn-archive/archive/package/utils/fuse, branch master

cosmetic: remove trailing whitespaces

2015-10-15T22:12:13Z

Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov SVN-Revision: 47197

fuse: fix exec environment for mount and umount

2015-05-24T17:56:26Z

* add upstream patch (CVE-2015-3202) * refresh patches * bump release number Signed-off-by: Nicolas Thill SVN-Revision: 45744

fuse: fix build on arm64

2015-05-23T15:29:31Z

error: ../include/fuse_kernel.h:93:15: error: conflicting types for 'int64_t' ../include/fuse_kernel.h:92:15: error: conflicting types for 'uint64_t' reported by buildbot fix by adopting upstream patch: http://git.baserock.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/delta/fuse.git/commit/include/fuse_kernel.h?id=914871b20a901e3e1e981c92bc42b1c93b7ab81b Signed-off-by: Dirk Neukirchen SVN-Revision: 45740

fuse: add missing include lines, fixes musl build

2015-03-28T10:19:18Z

Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau SVN-Revision: 45076

fuse: update to 2.9.3

2015-01-11T22:15:03Z

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Thill SVN-Revision: 43941

license info - revert r43155

2014-11-03T09:56:44Z

turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info. Signed-off-by: John Crispin SVN-Revision: 43167

Add more license tags with SPDX identifiers

2014-11-03T08:01:08Z

Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied together - each with different licensing information in the file headers. I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license in my opinion. However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information and/or did not miss license information. Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold SVN-Revision: 43155

packages: clean up the package folder

2013-06-21T16:54:37Z

Signed-off-by: John Crispin SVN-Revision: 37007