<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>bcm63xx/u-boot/doc/README.mpc85xx, branch master</title>
<subtitle>Broadcom-s U-Boot</subtitle>
<id>https://git.openwrt.org/project/bcm63xx/u-boot/atom?h=master</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.openwrt.org/project/bcm63xx/u-boot/atom?h=master'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.openwrt.org/project/bcm63xx/u-boot/'/>
<updated>2017-04-13T13:40:57Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>board_f: Rename initdram() to dram_init()</title>
<updated>2017-04-13T13:40:57Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Simon Glass</name>
</author>
<published>2017-04-06T18:47:05Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.openwrt.org/project/bcm63xx/u-boot/commit/?id=f1683aa73c31db0a025e0254e6ce1ee7e56aad3e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f1683aa73c31db0a025e0254e6ce1ee7e56aad3e</id>
<content type='text'>
This allows us to use the same DRAM init function on all archs. Add a
dummy function for arc, which does not use DRAM init here.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass &lt;sjg@chromium.org&gt;
[trini: Dummy function on nios2]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini &lt;trini@konsulko.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>spl/85xx: new SPL support</title>
<updated>2012-11-26T21:41:25Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Scott Wood</name>
</author>
<published>2012-09-21T00:02:18Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.openwrt.org/project/bcm63xx/u-boot/commit/?id=c97cd1ba480482e220c5dcef0cd751d21a1bf74e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c97cd1ba480482e220c5dcef0cd751d21a1bf74e</id>
<content type='text'>
Update CONFIG_RAMBOOT and CONFIG_NAND_SPL references to accept CONFIG_SPL
and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, respectively.  CONFIG_NAND_SPL can be removed once
the last mpc85xx nand_spl target is gone.

CONFIG_RAMBOOT will need to remain for other use cases, but it doesn't
seem right to overload it for meaning SPL as well as nand_spl does.  Even
if it's somewhat appropriate for the main u-boot, the SPL itself isn't
(necessarily) ramboot, and we don't have separate configs for SPL and
main u-boot.  It was also inconsistent, as other platforms such as
mpc83xx didn't use CONFIG_RAMBOOT in this way.

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood &lt;scottwood@freescale.com&gt;
Cc: Andy Fleming &lt;afleming@freescale.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Minor Coding Style Cleanup.</title>
<updated>2012-07-22T19:58:26Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Wolfgang Denk</name>
</author>
<published>2012-07-22T19:58:26Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.openwrt.org/project/bcm63xx/u-boot/commit/?id=00c60f9131b513af9fc85d0cf1b6a6148d754a90'/>
<id>urn:sha1:00c60f9131b513af9fc85d0cf1b6a6148d754a90</id>
<content type='text'>
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk &lt;wd@denx.de&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PATCH 1/4][v4] doc:Add documentation for e500 external debugger support</title>
<updated>2012-07-06T22:30:30Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Prabhakar Kushwaha</name>
</author>
<published>2012-04-29T23:56:13Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.openwrt.org/project/bcm63xx/u-boot/commit/?id=afa6b551fddc35a83e40c63101947d237bde5183'/>
<id>urn:sha1:afa6b551fddc35a83e40c63101947d237bde5183</id>
<content type='text'>
This describes requirement of e500 and e500v2 processor to support external
debugger.

It also provide an insight of the configuration switch required and their
description.

Signed-off-by: Radu Lazarescu &lt;radu.lazarescu@freescale.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Marius Grigoras &lt;marius.grigoras@freescale.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha &lt;prabhakar@freescale.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
