mediatek: Add support for Xiaomi Redmi Router AX6S
[openwrt/staging/wigyori.git] / target / linux / generic / backport-5.4 / 770-v5.12-net-bridge-notify-switchdev-of-disappearance-of-old-.patch
1 From 90dc8fd36078a536671adae884d0b929cce6480a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2 From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
3 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 11:51:30 +0200
4 Subject: [PATCH] net: bridge: notify switchdev of disappearance of old FDB
5 entry upon migration
6
7 Currently the bridge emits atomic switchdev notifications for
8 dynamically learnt FDB entries. Monitoring these notifications works
9 wonders for switchdev drivers that want to keep their hardware FDB in
10 sync with the bridge's FDB.
11
12 For example station A wants to talk to station B in the diagram below,
13 and we are concerned with the behavior of the bridge on the DUT device:
14
15 DUT
16 +-------------------------------------+
17 | br0 |
18 | +------+ +------+ +------+ +------+ |
19 | | | | | | | | | |
20 | | swp0 | | swp1 | | swp2 | | eth0 | |
21 +-------------------------------------+
22 | | |
23 Station A | |
24 | |
25 +--+------+--+ +--+------+--+
26 | | | | | | | |
27 | | swp0 | | | | swp0 | |
28 Another | +------+ | | +------+ | Another
29 switch | br0 | | br0 | switch
30 | +------+ | | +------+ |
31 | | | | | | | |
32 | | swp1 | | | | swp1 | |
33 +--+------+--+ +--+------+--+
34 |
35 Station B
36
37 Interfaces swp0, swp1, swp2 are handled by a switchdev driver that has
38 the following property: frames injected from its control interface bypass
39 the internal address analyzer logic, and therefore, this hardware does
40 not learn from the source address of packets transmitted by the network
41 stack through it. So, since bridging between eth0 (where Station B is
42 attached) and swp0 (where Station A is attached) is done in software,
43 the switchdev hardware will never learn the source address of Station B.
44 So the traffic towards that destination will be treated as unknown, i.e.
45 flooded.
46
47 This is where the bridge notifications come in handy. When br0 on the
48 DUT sees frames with Station B's MAC address on eth0, the switchdev
49 driver gets these notifications and can install a rule to send frames
50 towards Station B's address that are incoming from swp0, swp1, swp2,
51 only towards the control interface. This is all switchdev driver private
52 business, which the notification makes possible.
53
54 All is fine until someone unplugs Station B's cable and moves it to the
55 other switch:
56
57 DUT
58 +-------------------------------------+
59 | br0 |
60 | +------+ +------+ +------+ +------+ |
61 | | | | | | | | | |
62 | | swp0 | | swp1 | | swp2 | | eth0 | |
63 +-------------------------------------+
64 | | |
65 Station A | |
66 | |
67 +--+------+--+ +--+------+--+
68 | | | | | | | |
69 | | swp0 | | | | swp0 | |
70 Another | +------+ | | +------+ | Another
71 switch | br0 | | br0 | switch
72 | +------+ | | +------+ |
73 | | | | | | | |
74 | | swp1 | | | | swp1 | |
75 +--+------+--+ +--+------+--+
76 |
77 Station B
78
79 Luckily for the use cases we care about, Station B is noisy enough that
80 the DUT hears it (on swp1 this time). swp1 receives the frames and
81 delivers them to the bridge, who enters the unlikely path in br_fdb_update
82 of updating an existing entry. It moves the entry in the software bridge
83 to swp1 and emits an addition notification towards that.
84
85 As far as the switchdev driver is concerned, all that it needs to ensure
86 is that traffic between Station A and Station B is not forever broken.
87 If it does nothing, then the stale rule to send frames for Station B
88 towards the control interface remains in place. But Station B is no
89 longer reachable via the control interface, but via a port that can
90 offload the bridge port learning attribute. It's just that the port is
91 prevented from learning this address, since the rule overrides FDB
92 updates. So the rule needs to go. The question is via what mechanism.
93
94 It sure would be possible for this switchdev driver to keep track of all
95 addresses which are sent to the control interface, and then also listen
96 for bridge notifier events on its own ports, searching for the ones that
97 have a MAC address which was previously sent to the control interface.
98 But this is cumbersome and inefficient. Instead, with one small change,
99 the bridge could notify of the address deletion from the old port, in a
100 symmetrical manner with how it did for the insertion. Then the switchdev
101 driver would not be required to monitor learn/forget events for its own
102 ports. It could just delete the rule towards the control interface upon
103 bridge entry migration. This would make hardware address learning be
104 possible again. Then it would take a few more packets until the hardware
105 and software FDB would be in sync again.
106
107 Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
108 Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>
109 Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
110 Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
111 Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
112 Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
113 ---
114 net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 1 +
115 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
116
117 --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
118 +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
119 @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ void br_fdb_update(struct net_bridge *br
120
121 /* fastpath: update of existing entry */
122 if (unlikely(source != fdb->dst && !fdb->is_sticky)) {
123 + br_switchdev_fdb_notify(fdb, RTM_DELNEIGH);
124 fdb->dst = source;
125 fdb_modified = true;
126 /* Take over HW learned entry */